Co-repressing immunometabolic processes in atherosclerosis
Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of mortality in the world, and tightly associated with the metabolic syndrome, which is a cluster of interconnected metabolic dysfunctions including insulin resistance, obesity, hypertension and dyslipidaemias. These dysfunctions increase the risk of developing atherosclerosis and consequent cardiovascular diseases, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Atherosclerosis is primarily triggered by increased plasma cholesterol levels and can be classified as an immunometabolic disease, a chronic disease that is affected by both metabolic and inflammatory triggers and/or mediators. These triggers and mediators activate common downstream pathways, including nuclear receptor signalling. Interestingly, specific cofactors that bind to these complexes act as immunometabolic integrators. This review provides examples of such co-regulator complexes, including nuclear sirtuins, nuclear receptor co-repressor 1 (NCOR1), nuclear receptor interacting protein 1 (NRIP1), and prospero homeobox 1 (PROX1). Their study might provide novel insight into mechanistic regulations and the identification of new targets to treat atherosclerosis.
Keywords: atherosclerosis, immunometabolism, mechanisms of disease, nuclear receptor co-repressor, nuclear receptor signalling
Increased plasma cholesterol triggers atherogenesis
Atherosclerosis is a chronic immunometabolic disease and remains asymptomatic until a plaque becomes large enough to obstruct the lumen to cause ischaemic pain or ruptures causing a myocardial infarction, stroke or peripheral artery disease. Research over the past decades demonstrated that the chronic accumulation of lipids, especially cholesterol, in our circulation is the major trigger of atherosclerosis. First, most gene candidates identified in familial genetic or genome-wide association studies for coronary artery disease or atherosclerosis, are associated with lipid and/or lipoprotein metabolism [1, 2]. Second, the primary choice of treatment in patients with high-risk to develop cardiovascular diseases is to lower the levels of circulating total and low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol by primarily targeting hepatic cholesterol metabolism and/or the intestinal cholesterol uptake, with, for example, statins, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors and/or ezetimibe [3–10]. Third, all the genetic and dietary mouse models that are used to promote atherosclerosis development function by primarily altering the lipoprotein metabolism towards a humanised profile . This knowledge suggests that the hyperlipidaemia, especially the hypercholesterolaemia, combined with the genetic predisposition is the major trigger of the disease. Nevertheless, recent research showed that metabolic and inflammatory processes are closely interconnected at the cellular level as well as via intra- and inter-organ communication (fig. 1) [12, 13].
The liver regulates systemic cholesterol metabolism
The liver plays a crucial role in the development of atherosclerosis by regulating metabolic and inflammatory processes, such as the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and acute phase response proteins, the secretion of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles, the uptake of cholesterol from the circulation, and biliary cholesterol excretion (fig. 2). An immunometabolic dysregulation in the liver can promote nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the development of atherosclerosis. Importantly, NAFLD leads to adverse cardiovascular functions, such as increased oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulability and accelerated development of atherosclerosis [14–16]. Most of the currently used drugs primarily target hepatic cholesterol synthesis via the inhibition of hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CA) reductase (statins) or hepatic cholesterol re-uptake from the circulation by decreasing the breakdown of the LDL receptor (e.g., PCSK9 inhibitors or silencing) [4–10].
Macrophage foam cells promote plaque development
Upon exposure to atherogenic triggers, vascular endothelial cells are activated and start to express adhesion molecules. These adhesion molecules attract and activate blood monocytes, which then transmigrate into the arterial intima. Macrophages are the most abundant population of cells within the plaques and one hallmark of atherogenesis is the excessive accumulation of cholesterol in monocyte-derived macrophages, leading to foam cell formation. The uptake of modified – especially oxidised – low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL) is driven by scavenger receptors and these are stored as cholesterol esters in lipid droplets. Moreover, macrophages interact with other immune cells, especially T cells, and this immune response can promote pro- or anti-inflammatory processes (fig. 2) [17, 18].
Clinical evidence of immunometabolic regulation
Several powerful cardiovascular drugs demonstrated that metabolic and inflammatory processes can be targeted to treat atherosclerosis (fig. 3), such as the HMG-CA reductase inhibitors (statins) to lower LDL-cholesterol levels, or interleukin-1β (IL-1β) receptor antagonists or colchicine to block the pro-inflammatory processes in cardiovascular disease and type-2 diabetes [4, 5, 19–21]. Although these drugs primarily target either a metabolic or an inflammatory process, recent research demonstrated that they do also affect inflammatory or metabolic signalling, respectively. For example, besides targeting the HMG-CA reductase, statins exert various pleiotropic effects that are mediated by intermediates of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. A recent study demonstrated that, by inhibiting mevalonate synthesis, statins counteract the epigenetic reprogramming that leads to trained immunity in monocyte-derived macrophages . Other metabolites of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway, such as farnesyl pyrophosphate and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate, also exhibit important anti-inflammatory effects . Further studies demonstrated that statins also modulate the response of the adaptive immune system, such as the function of Th17 cells in autoimmune disease .
Crosstalk of inflammatory and metabolic signalling
One of the first hints for a direct role of inflammatory processes in the development of a metabolic disease came in the 1990s, when it was shown that normal and atherosclerotic arteries express tumour necrosis factor (TNF) . Two years later, it was demonstrated that the adipose tissue secretes TNF in obese and/or diabetic mice and humans, thereby directly linking an inflammatory cytokine to another chronic metabolic disease [26–28]. Later studies showed that the genetic deletion of Tnf reduces atherosclerosis development [29–31], and it is now known that various cytokines and chemokines regulate atherogenesis [32, 33].
Binding of TNF and other cytokines and chemokines to their corresponding receptors induces the activation of downstream signalling kinases, including IκB kinase (IKK), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), p38 and Janus kinase (JAK) (fig. 4). Signalling from these kinases leads to the activation of central inflammatory transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) upon IKK signalling, activating protein-1 (AP-1) upon p38/JNK (MAPK) signalling, or signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) upon JAK1 signalling. Notably, these inflammatory transcription factors also regulate metabolic processes at different layers. For example, they interact with and coordinate the transcriptional activity of metabolic transcription factors, such as the nuclear receptors peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and liver X receptors (LXRs), which in turn are activated by specific lipids [34–36]. Furthermore, inflammatory signalling can induce the expression of central metabolic regulators, such as sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBP-1 and SREBP-2), and of a series of metabolic enzymes [37–41].
Lipid-responsive nuclear receptors with immunometabolic functions
The family of nuclear receptors can be subdivided into endocrine receptors that are bound by hormones, adopted orphan nuclear receptors that are activated by different metabolites such as fatty acids and cholesterol derivates, and orphan nuclear receptors that do not (yet) have any known natural ligand [42, 43]. Importantly, most nuclear receptors have a ligand binding pocket and are therefore potential drug targets. The function of several nuclear receptors in atherosclerosis has been reviewed previously . The class of adopted and orphan nuclear receptors is of special interest since several of them are bound and activated by specific lipids, such as PPARγ, LXRs and liver receptor homologue-1 (LRH-1) (fig. 4). Besides regulating various metabolic processes, these lipid-binding nuclear receptors also mediate transrepression of pro-inflammatory molecules in metabolic organs and immune cells [34–36, 45–47], thus acting as immunometabolic regulators.
Transcription cofactors as immunometabolic integrators
Transcriptional co-regulators play a central role in immunometabolic regulation because they are regulated by upstream inflammatory or metabolic mediators and coordinate the transcriptional activity of key immunometabolic transcription factors. Importantly, several cofactors are expressed in a tissue-specific manner, at a specific time point during development or upon specific upstream stimuli, therefore acting under very specific conditions. From an immunometabolic point of view it will be very interesting to identify and study the co-regulators that are implicated in both inflammatory and metabolic processes. Approximately 300 transcriptional cofactors exist in mammalian cells , but the function of most these cofactors is not yet known. The functions of some selected cofactors that regulate atherogenesis are summarised below.
Sirtuins – multiple roles in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases
Sirtuins are nutrient-sensitive protein deacetylases, which play important roles in various molecular and physiological processes . SIRT1, the best studied sirtuin, exerts various protective cardiovascular functions. Several studies demonstrated that SIRT1 diminishes the development of atherosclerosis and exhibits other cardioprotective effects (fig. 5) [51, 52]. By deacetylating and interfering with the activation of the RelA/p65 subunit of NF-κB, SIRT1 inhibits inflammatory signalling, prevents macrophage foam cell formation, diminishes endothelial cell activation and reduces the expression of tissue factor, a key factor in the activation of the coagulation cascade during arteriothrombosis [53–56]. Besides exerting these direct anti-inflammatory effects, SIRT1 also regulates the function of specific nuclear receptors. These studies highlight that SIRT1 acts as an immunometabolic regulator. Other sirtuins also exert distinct cardioprotective functions (reviewed in ). Several approaches that were tested in order to induce the activity of sirtuins by increasing the levels of its substrate, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), showed protective cardiometabolic effects [58–63].
NCOR1 – an emerging regulator of immunometabolic processes
NCOR1 forms a large co-repressor complex containing histone deacetylases that inhibit the transcriptional function of nuclear receptors [64, 65]. Tissue-specific deletions of Ncor1 in metabolic organs showed that it regulates fatty acid metabolism, mitochondrial functions, insulin sensitivity, bile acid composition and intestinal cholesterol absorption [66–69]. Moreover, NCOR1 exerts both pro- and anti-inflammatory functions in macrophages, and its deletion in adipocytes reduces adipose tissue macrophage infiltration and inflammation [35, 67, 70, 71].
Recently published data demonstrated that the deletion of macrophage Ncor1 promotes atherosclerosis development in mice, and their atherosclerotic lesions displayed thinner fibrous caps and larger necrotic cores, suggesting that NCOR1 stabilises atherosclerotic plaques . At the molecular level, it was shown that NCOR1 binds to the Cd36 promoter, a scavenger receptor that mediates the uncontrolled uptake of modified LDL particles [73, 74]. Consequently, NCOR1-deficient peritoneal macrophages displayed increased CD36 expression and enhanced accumulation of oxLDL compared with control macrophages (fig. 5). The increased expression of CD36 was secondary to a derepression of PPARγ target genes. Treatment of peritoneal macrophages with the PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone led to an enhanced expression of several direct and indirect PPARγ target genes, including both pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules, thus suggesting that NCOR1 exerts atheroprotective functions by repressing detrimental functions of PPARγ in macrophages (fig. 5).
To establish the contribution of macrophage NCOR1 in human atherosclerosis, the authors further explored its expression in publicly available datasets and showed that the expression of Ncor1 was reduced in carotid plaques in comparison to non-atherosclerotic biopsies from mammary arteries. Moreover, analysis of expression data from laser micro-dissected macrophages  revealed that all significantly changed PPARγ target genes were robustly increased in macrophages from ruptured compared with non-ruptured plaques, and targeted protein analyses showed that NCOR1 is reduced in ruptured compared to non-ruptured carotid plaque .
Earlier studies demonstrated that NCOR1 can also interact with B cell lymphoma-6 (BCL6), a transcriptional repressor that belongs to a class of zinc-finger transcription factors. This interaction promotes the repression of several processes, including the expression of pro-inflammatory NF-κB target genes [76–78].
In the liver, nuclear co-repressors modulate liver energy metabolism during the fasting-feeding transition. The NCOR1-HDAC3 complex regulates both catabolic and anabolic processes in the liver. Upon feeding, the target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)-AKT signalling pathway is activated by increasing levels of glucose and insulin, which leads to the phosphorylation of serine 1460 of NCOR1 (pS1460 NCOR1). The pS1460 phosphorylation reduces the capacity of NCOR1 to interact with LXRs, hence increasing the transcription of de novo lipogenesis genes, and conversely, it fosters the interaction with PPARα and ERRα, thus subsequently repressing downstream ketogenic and Oxphos genes . Under fasting conditions, the NCOR1-HDAC3 complex represses the expression of de novo lipogenesis genes (fig. 5) [79, 80].
PROX1 – a critical regulator of hepatic metabolism
Prospero-related homeobox 1 (PROX1) is a conserved co-repressor that is mainly expressed in liver, lymphatic vessels, lens, dentate gyrus, neuroendocrine cells of the adrenal medulla, megakaryocytes, and platelets . It interacts with several nuclear receptors, including the LRH-1, oestrogen-related receptor (ERR), steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR), and retinoic acid-related orphan receptors (ROR), as well as other transcriptional regulators, such as HDAC3 or lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) [82–84]. The interaction of PROX1 with LRH-1 was first described in Drosophila  and human cells , and the LRH-1/PROX1 interaction has been reported to regulate liver development and function [86, 87]. Importantly, it was demonstrated that PROX1 is required to promote the beneficial effects of LRH-1 on reverse cholesterol transport and atherogenesis: Atherosclerosis-prone mice carrying a mutation that abolishes the SUMOylation of LRH-1 are significantly protected from atherosclerosis development by promoting reverse cholesterol transport (fig. 5) . This study highlighted that a single posttranslational modification of a nuclear receptor is sufficient to modulate the function of the protein and impact on the development of chronic cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, LRH-1 drives the differentiation of macrophages towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype (fig. 5)  . Whether or not the LRH-1-PROX1 complex affects the development of atherosclerosis in humans in not yet known. However, as it is a potent regulator of bile acid synthesis and composition , it is tempting to assume that this nuclear receptor-co-repressor complex plays a key role in chronic hepatic diseases or upon liver transplantation. On the other hand, the same LRH-1 mutation promotes the development of NAFLD and early signs of steatohepatitis and Lrh-1-deficient mice are protected against hepatic cancer [91, 92].
RIP140 – a regulator of macrophage metabolism and inflammation
Nuclear receptor interacting protein 1 (NRIP1; also known as receptor interacting protein 140, RIP140) is a co-regulator that is ubiquitously expressed, interacts with several nuclear receptors and regulates downstream immunometabolic processes [93, 94]. Interestingly, TLR signalling leads to RIP140 ubiquitination and degradation, which in turn reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine production and promotes endotoxin tolerance . Moreover, RIP140 promotes foam cell formation by inhibiting LXR-driven Abca1 and Abag1 expression, thus impairing HDL-driven cholesterol efflux from macrophages [96, 97]. Consistently, microRNA-specific silencing of Rip140 in macrophages reduces the development of atherosclerotic lesions in Apoe knockout mice (fig. 5) .
In the liver, RIP140 is recruited to a complex of krüppel-like factor 15 (KLF15) and LXR/RXR on the promoter of genes regulating de novo lipogenesis and thus regulating the feeding-fasting transition (fig. 5) [98, 99]. This RIP140-KLF15-LXR complex likely regulates other processes that affect atherosclerosis development in the liver, macrophages and other tissues. Notably, KLF15 mRNA expression is reduced in human atherosclerotic compared to nonatherosclerotic aortae, and the systemic or smooth muscle cell-specific deletion of Klf15 aggravates atherosclerosis development in Apoe knockout mice .
Myocardial infarction and stroke are the leading causes of mortality worldwide, and atherosclerotic plaque rupture or erosion are the primary triggers of these two cardiovascular diseases. Currently, the primary approach to reduce the progression of atherosclerosis in humans is to target the dyslipidaemia, especially by reducing increased LDL-cholesterol levels, besides treating hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Targeting the LDL metabolism levels will continue to be primary intervention in patients with increased total and LDL-cholesterol, which can now be successfully achieved by combining statins with intestinal Niemann-Pick C1-like protein 1 (NPC1L1) or hepatic PCSK9 inhibitors [3–10]. Furthermore, new drugs to treat dyslipidaemias are emerging, such as apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC3), Apo(a) or angiopoietin like 3 (ANGPTL3) silencing therapeutics .
Another potent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events besides LDL-cholesterol is high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), thus suggesting that targeting central pro-inflammatory processes will likely also be a future therapeutic option. This is also underlined by the success of the recent COLCOT and CANTOS trials [19, 21]. Therefore, there is a clear biomedical interest in identifying, understanding and testing new (anti-)atherogenic pathways as therapeutic targets.
Targeting specific nuclear receptor-cofactor complexes could become a promising approach to promote beneficial metabolic functions and inhibit chronic anti-inflammatory processes. Some examples were discussed in this review, but research over past years identified many more promising targets for cardiovascular diseases . For instance, strategies to stabilise or augment NCOR1 function in macrophages could protect against excessive oxLDL uptake, macrophage foam cell formation and pro-inflammatory gene expression, and thus prevent further growth and destabilisation of atherosclerotic plaques [50, 72], such as in primary prevention for patients with very high risk for atherosclerotic disease or in secondary prevention. In the liver, targeting NCOR1, for example with synthetic siRNAs conjugated to triantennary N-acetylgalactosamine carbohydrates [9, 103], could be tested to prevent fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis in patients with NAFLD, which is a growing patient population globally and exposed to increased cardiovascular risk [50, 68]. However, these therapeutic approaches first have to be tested in pre-clinical models before being translated to humans.
SS was financially supported by the Swiss Heart Foundation (FF19025).
Potential Competing interests
No conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
PD Dr Sokrates Stein,
University of Zurich,
Novartis Pharma Schweiz,
1 Kessler T, Vilne B, Schunkert H. The impact of genome-wide association studies on the pathophysiology and therapy of cardiovascular disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8(7):688–701. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201506174 PubMed
2 Roberts R. Genetics of coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2014;114(12):1890–903. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302692 PubMed
3 Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, et al.; IMPROVE-IT Investigators. Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387–97. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1410489 PubMed
4 Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Crowe T, Sasiela WJ, Tsai J, et al.; Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) Investigators. Statin therapy, LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(1):29–38. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042000 PubMed
5 Ridker PM, Cannon CP, Morrow D, Rifai N, Rose LM, McCabe CH, et al.; Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) Investigators. C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(1):20–8. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042378 PubMed
6 Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al.; FOURIER Steering Committee and Investigators. Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1713–22. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1615664 PubMed
7 Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, et al.; ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Committees and Investigators. Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2097–107. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801174 PubMed
8 Raal FJ, Kallend D, Ray KK, Turner T, Koenig W, Wright RS, et al.; ORION-9 Investigators. Inclisiran for the Treatment of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1520–30. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1913805 PubMed
9 Ray KK, Landmesser U, Leiter LA, Kallend D, Dufour R, Karakas M, et al. Inclisiran in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1430–40. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1615758 PubMed
10 Ray KK, Wright RS, Kallend D, Koenig W, Leiter LA, Raal FJ, et al.; ORION-10 and ORION-11 Investigators. Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(16):1507–19. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1912387 PubMed
11 Oppi S, Lüscher TF, Stein S. Mouse Models for Atherosclerosis Research-Which Is My Line? Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019;6(46):46. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00046 PubMed
12 Hotamisligil GS. Foundations of Immunometabolism and Implications for Metabolic Health and Disease. Immunity. 2017;47(3):406–20. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.08.009 PubMed
13 Saltiel AR, Olefsky JM. Inflammatory mechanisms linking obesity and metabolic disease. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(1):1–4. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI92035 PubMed
14 Anstee QM, Targher G, Day CP. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(6):330–44. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.41 PubMed
15 Bhatia LS, Curzen NP, Calder PC, Byrne CD. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a new and important cardiovascular risk factor? Eur Heart J. 2012;33(10):1190–200. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr453 PubMed
16 Byrne CD, Targher G. NAFLD: a multisystem disease. J Hepatol. 2015;62(1, Suppl):S47–64. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.012 PubMed
17 Kuznetsova T, Prange KHM, Glass CK, de Winther MPJ. Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of macrophages in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(4):216–28. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41569-019-0265-3 PubMed
18 Tabas I, Lichtman AH. Monocyte-Macrophages and T Cells in Atherosclerosis. Immunity. 2017;47(4):621–34. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.008 PubMed
19 Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al.; CANTOS Trial Group. Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–31. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1707914 PubMed
20 Larsen CM, Faulenbach M, Vaag A, Vølund A, Ehses JA, Seifert B, et al. Interleukin-1-receptor antagonist in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1517–26. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa065213 PubMed
21 Tardif JC, Kouz S, Waters DD, Bertrand OF, Diaz R, Maggioni AP, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2497–505. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1912388 PubMed
22 Bekkering S, Arts RJW, Novakovic B, Kourtzelis I, van der Heijden CDCC, Li Y, et al. Metabolic Induction of Trained Immunity through the Mevalonate Pathway. Cell. 2018;172(1-2):135–146.e9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.025 PubMed
23 Zeiser R. Immune modulatory effects of statins. Immunology. 2018;154(1):69–75. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imm.12902 PubMed
24 Ulivieri C, Baldari CT. Statins: from cholesterol-lowering drugs to novel immunomodulators for the treatment of Th17-mediated autoimmune diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2014;88:41–52. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2014.03.001 PubMed
25 Rus HG, Niculescu F, Vlaicu R. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human arterial wall with atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1991;89(2-3):247–54. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(91)90066-C PubMed
26 Hotamisligil GS, Shargill NS, Spiegelman BM. Adipose expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha: direct role in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Science. 1993;259(5091):87–91. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7678183 PubMed
27 Hotamisligil GS, Arner P, Caro JF, Atkinson RL, Spiegelman BM. Increased adipose tissue expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in human obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1995;95(5):2409–15. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI117936 PubMed
28 Kern PA, Saghizadeh M, Ong JM, Bosch RJ, Deem R, Simsolo RB. The expression of tumor necrosis factor in human adipose tissue. Regulation by obesity, weight loss, and relationship to lipoprotein lipase. J Clin Invest. 1995;95(5):2111–9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI117899 PubMed
29 Brånén L, Hovgaard L, Nitulescu M, Bengtsson E, Nilsson J, Jovinge S. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha reduces atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(11):2137–42. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000143933.20616.1b PubMed
30 Ohta H, Wada H, Niwa T, Kirii H, Iwamoto N, Fujii H, et al. Disruption of tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene diminishes the development of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Atherosclerosis. 2005;180(1):11–7. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.11.016 PubMed
31 Canault M, Peiretti F, Mueller C, Kopp F, Morange P, Rihs S, et al. Exclusive expression of transmembrane TNF-alpha in mice reduces the inflammatory response in early lipid lesions of aortic sinus. Atherosclerosis. 2004;172(2):211–8. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2003.10.004 PubMed
32 Weber C, Noels H. Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1410–22. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2538 PubMed
33 Kusters PJ, Lutgens E. Cytokines and Immune Responses in Murine Atherosclerosis. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1339:17–40. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2929-0_2 PubMed
34 Pascual G, Fong AL, Ogawa S, Gamliel A, Li AC, Perissi V, et al. A SUMOylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR-gamma. Nature. 2005;437(7059):759–63. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03988 PubMed
35 Ghisletti S, Huang W, Jepsen K, Benner C, Hardiman G, Rosenfeld MG, et al. Cooperative NCoR/SMRT interactions establish a corepressor-based strategy for integration of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory signaling pathways. Genes Dev. 2009;23(6):681–93. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1773109 PubMed
36 Venteclef N, Jakobsson T, Steffensen KR, Treuter E. Metabolic nuclear receptor signaling and the inflammatory acute phase response. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2011;22(8):333–43. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2011.04.004 PubMed
37 Tornatore L, Thotakura AK, Bennett J, Moretti M, Franzoso G. The nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway: integrating metabolism with inflammation. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22(11):557–66. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2012.08.001 PubMed
38 Dodington DW, Desai HR, Woo M. JAK/STAT - Emerging Players in Metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29(1):55–65. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2017.11.001 PubMed
39 Endo M, Masaki T, Seike M, Yoshimatsu H. TNF-alpha induces hepatic steatosis in mice by enhancing gene expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c). Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2007;232(5):614–21. PubMed
40 Hasenfuss SC, Bakiri L, Thomsen MK, Williams EG, Auwerx J, Wagner EF. Regulation of steatohepatitis and PPARγ signaling by distinct AP-1 dimers. Cell Metab. 2014;19(1):84–95. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.018 PubMed
41 Manieri E, Sabio G. Stress kinases in the modulation of metabolism and energy balance. J Mol Endocrinol. 2015;55(2):R11–22. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/JME-15-0146 PubMed
42 Glass CK, Ogawa S. Combinatorial roles of nuclear receptors in inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(1):44–55. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri1748 PubMed
43 Francis GA, Fayard E, Picard F, Auwerx J. Nuclear receptors and the control of metabolism. Annu Rev Physiol. 2003;65(1):261–311. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142528 PubMed
44 Kurakula K, Hamers AA, de Waard V, de Vries CJ. Nuclear Receptors in atherosclerosis: a superfamily with many ‘Goodfellas’. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013;368(1-2):71–84. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2012.05.014 PubMed
45 Ghisletti S, Huang W, Ogawa S, Pascual G, Lin ME, Willson TM, et al. Parallel SUMOylation-dependent pathways mediate gene- and signal-specific transrepression by LXRs and PPARgamma. Mol Cell. 2007;25(1):57–70. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.022 PubMed
46 Glass CK, Saijo K. Nuclear receptor transrepression pathways that regulate inflammation in macrophages and T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(5):365–76. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri2748 PubMed
47 Treuter E, Venteclef N. Transcriptional control of metabolic and inflammatory pathways by nuclear receptor SUMOylation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1812(8):909–18. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.12.008 PubMed
48 Zhang HM, Chen H, Liu W, Liu H, Gong J, Wang H, et al. AnimalTFDB: a comprehensive animal transcription factor database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D144–9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr965 PubMed
49 Houtkooper RH, Pirinen E, Auwerx J. Sirtuins as regulators of metabolism and healthspan. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(4):225–38. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3293 PubMed
50 Geiger MA, Guillaumon AT, Paneni F, Matter CM, Stein S. Role of the Nuclear Receptor Corepressor 1 (NCOR1) in Atherosclerosis and Associated Immunometabolic Diseases. Front Immunol. 2020;11:569358. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.569358 PubMed
51 Winnik S, Stein S, Matter CM. SIRT1 - an anti-inflammatory pathway at the crossroads between metabolic disease and atherosclerosis. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2012;10(6):693–6. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157016112803520756 PubMed
52 Stein S, Matter CM. Protective roles of SIRT1 in atherosclerosis. Cell Cycle. 2011;10(4):640–7. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.4.14863 PubMed
53 Breitenstein A, Stein S, Holy EW, Camici GG, Lohmann C, Akhmedov A, et al. Sirt1 inhibition promotes in vivo arterial thrombosis and tissue factor expression in stimulated cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89(2):464–72. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvq339 PubMed
54 Stein S, Lohmann C, Schäfer N, Hofmann J, Rohrer L, Besler C, et al. SIRT1 decreases Lox-1-mediated foam cell formation in atherogenesis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(18):2301–9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq107 PubMed
55 Stein S, Schäfer N, Breitenstein A, Besler C, Winnik S, Lohmann C, et al. SIRT1 reduces endothelial activation without affecting vascular function in ApoE-/- mice. Aging (Albany NY). 2010;2(6):353–60. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.100162 PubMed
56 Schug TT, Xu Q, Gao H, Peres-da-Silva A, Draper DW, Fessler MB, et al. Myeloid deletion of SIRT1 induces inflammatory signaling in response to environmental stress. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(19):4712–21. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00657-10 PubMed
57 Winnik S, Auwerx J, Sinclair DA, Matter CM. Protective effects of sirtuins in cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(48):3404–12. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv290 PubMed
58 Katsyuba E, Auwerx J. Modulating NAD+ metabolism, from bench to bedside. EMBO J. 2017;36(18):2670–83. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.201797135 PubMed
59 Katsyuba E, Mottis A, Zietak M, De Franco F, van der Velpen V, Gariani K, et al. De novo NAD+ synthesis enhances mitochondrial function and improves health. Nature. 2018;563(7731):354–9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0645-6 PubMed
60 Mitchell SJ, Bernier M, Aon MA, Cortassa S, Kim EY, Fang EF, et al. Nicotinamide Improves Aspects of Healthspan, but Not Lifespan, in Mice. Cell Metab. 2018;27(3):667–676.e4. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.001 PubMed
61 Mills KF, Yoshida S, Stein LR, Grozio A, Kubota S, Sasaki Y, et al. Long-Term Administration of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Mitigates Age-Associated Physiological Decline in Mice. Cell Metab. 2016;24(6):795–806. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.013 PubMed
62 Rajman L, Chwalek K, Sinclair DA. Therapeutic Potential of NAD-Boosting Molecules: The In Vivo Evidence. Cell Metab. 2018;27(3):529–47. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.011 PubMed
63 Kang BE, Choi JY, Stein S, Ryu D. Implications of NAD+ boosters in translational medicine. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;50(10):e13334. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eci.13334 PubMed
64 Mottis A, Mouchiroud L, Auwerx J. Emerging roles of the corepressors NCoR1 and SMRT in homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2013;27(8):819–35. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.214023.113 PubMed
65 Perissi V, Jepsen K, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG. Deconstructing repression: evolving models of co-repressor action. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(2):109–23. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2736 PubMed
66 Yamamoto H, Williams EG, Mouchiroud L, Cantó C, Fan W, Downes M, et al. NCoR1 is a conserved physiological modulator of muscle mass and oxidative function. Cell. 2011;147(4):827–39. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.017 PubMed
67 Li P, Fan W, Xu J, Lu M, Yamamoto H, Auwerx J, et al. Adipocyte NCoR knockout decreases PPARγ phosphorylation and enhances PPARγ activity and insulin sensitivity. Cell. 2011;147(4):815–26. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.050 PubMed
68 Jo YS, Ryu D, Maida A, Wang X, Evans RM, Schoonjans K, et al. Phosphorylation of the nuclear receptor corepressor 1 by protein kinase B switches its corepressor targets in the liver in mice. Hepatology. 2015;62(5):1606–18. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.27907 PubMed
69 Astapova I, Ramadoss P, Costa-e-Sousa RH, Ye F, Holtz KA, Li Y, et al. Hepatic nuclear corepressor 1 regulates cholesterol absorption through a TRβ1-governed pathway. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(5):1976–86. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI73419 PubMed
70 Li P, Spann NJ, Kaikkonen MU, Lu M, Oh DY, Fox JN, et al. NCoR repression of LXRs restricts macrophage biosynthesis of insulin-sensitizing omega 3 fatty acids. Cell. 2013;155(1):200–14. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.054 PubMed
71 Wiesner P, Choi SH, Almazan F, Benner C, Huang W, Diehl CJ, et al. Low doses of lipopolysaccharide and minimally oxidized low-density lipoprotein cooperatively activate macrophages via nuclear factor kappa B and activator protein-1: possible mechanism for acceleration of atherosclerosis by subclinical endotoxemia. Circ Res. 2010;107(1):56–65. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.218420 PubMed
72 Oppi S, Nusser-Stein S, Blyszczuk P, Wang X, Jomard A, Marzolla V, et al. Macrophage NCOR1 protects from atherosclerosis by repressing a pro-atherogenic PPARγ signature. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(9):995–1005. PubMed
73 Park YM. CD36, a scavenger receptor implicated in atherosclerosis. Exp Mol Med. 2014;46(6):e99. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emm.2014.38 PubMed
74 Silverstein RL, Febbraio M. CD36, a scavenger receptor involved in immunity, metabolism, angiogenesis, and behavior. Sci Signal. 2009;2(72):re3. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.272re3 PubMed
75 Lee K, Santibanez-Koref M, Polvikoski T, Birchall D, Mendelow AD, Keavney B. Increased expression of fatty acid binding protein 4 and leptin in resident macrophages characterises atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Atherosclerosis. 2013;226(1):74–81. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.037 PubMed
76 Huynh KD, Bardwell VJ. The BCL-6 POZ domain and other POZ domains interact with the co-repressors N-CoR and SMRT. Oncogene. 1998;17(19):2473–84. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202197 PubMed
77 Cardenas MG, Oswald E, Yu W, Xue F, MacKerell AD, Melnick AM. The Expanding Role of the BCL6 Oncoprotein as a Cancer Therapeutic Target. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(4):885–93. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2071 PubMed
78 Barish GD, Yu RT, Karunasiri MS, Becerra D, Kim J, Tseng TW, et al. The Bcl6-SMRT/NCoR cistrome represses inflammation to attenuate atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 2012;15(4):554–62. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2012.02.012 PubMed
79 Sun Z, Feng D, Fang B, Mullican SE, You SH, Lim HW, et al. Deacetylase-independent function of HDAC3 in transcription and metabolism requires nuclear receptor corepressor. Mol Cell. 2013;52(6):769–82. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.022 PubMed
80 Alenghat T, Meyers K, Mullican SE, Leitner K, Adeniji-Adele A, Avila J, et al. Nuclear receptor corepressor and histone deacetylase 3 govern circadian metabolic physiology. Nature. 2008;456(7224):997–1000. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07541 PubMed
81 Truman LA, Bentley KL, Smith EC, Massaro SA, Gonzalez DG, Haberman AM, et al. ProxTom lymphatic vessel reporter mice reveal Prox1 expression in the adrenal medulla, megakaryocytes, and platelets. Am J Pathol. 2012;180(4):1715–25. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.12.026 PubMed
82 Azuma K, Urano T, Watabe T, Ouchi Y, Inoue S. PROX1 suppresses vitamin K-induced transcriptional activity of Steroid and Xenobiotic Receptor. Genes Cells. 2011;16(11):1063–70. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2011.01551.x PubMed
83 Ouyang H, Qin Y, Liu Y, Xie Y, Liu J. Prox1 directly interacts with LSD1 and recruits the LSD1/NuRD complex to epigenetically co-repress CYP7A1 transcription. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62192. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062192 PubMed
84 Takeda Y, Jetten AM. Prospero-related homeobox 1 (Prox1) functions as a novel modulator of retinoic acid-related orphan receptors α- and γ-mediated transactivation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(14):6992–7008. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt447 PubMed
85 Steffensen KR, Holter E, Båvner A, Nilsson M, Pelto-Huikko M, Tomarev S, et al. Functional conservation of interactions between a homeodomain cofactor and a mammalian FTZ-F1 homologue. EMBO Rep. 2004;5(6):613–9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400147 PubMed
86 Qin J, Gao DM, Jiang QF, Zhou Q, Kong YY, Wang Y, et al. Prospero-related homeobox (Prox1) is a corepressor of human liver receptor homolog-1 and suppresses the transcription of the cholesterol 7-alpha-hydroxylase gene. Mol Endocrinol. 2004;18(10):2424–39. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/me.2004-0009 PubMed
87 Kamiya A, Kakinuma S, Onodera M, Miyajima A, Nakauchi H. Prospero-related homeobox 1 and liver receptor homolog 1 coordinately regulate long-term proliferation of murine fetal hepatoblasts. Hepatology. 2008;48(1):252–64. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.22303 PubMed
88 Stein S, Oosterveer MH, Mataki C, Xu P, Lemos V, Havinga R, et al. SUMOylation-dependent LRH-1/PROX1 interaction promotes atherosclerosis by decreasing hepatic reverse cholesterol transport. Cell Metab. 2014;20(4):603–13. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.023 PubMed
89 Lefèvre L, Authier H, Stein S, Majorel C, Couderc B, Dardenne C, et al. LRH-1 mediates anti-inflammatory and antifungal phenotype of IL-13-activated macrophages through the PPARγ ligand synthesis. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):6801. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7801 PubMed
90 Stein S, Schoonjans K. Molecular basis for the regulation of the nuclear receptor LRH-1. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;33:26–34. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2014.10.007 PubMed
91 Stein S, Lemos V, Xu P, Demagny H, Wang X, Ryu D, et al. Impaired SUMOylation of nuclear receptor LRH-1 promotes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(2):583–92. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI85499 PubMed
92 Xu P, Oosterveer MH, Stein S, Demagny H, Ryu D, Moullan N, et al. LRH-1-dependent programming of mitochondrial glutamine processing drives liver cancer. Genes Dev. 2016;30(11):1255–60. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.277483.116 PubMed
93 Lee CH, Chinpaisal C, Wei LN. Cloning and characterization of mouse RIP140, a corepressor for nuclear orphan receptor TR2. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18(11):6745–55. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.18.11.6745 PubMed
94 Nautiyal J, Christian M, Parker MG. Distinct functions for RIP140 in development, inflammation, and metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2013;24(9):451–9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2013.05.001 PubMed
95 Ho PC, Tsui YC, Feng X, Greaves DR, Wei LN. NF-κB-mediated degradation of the coactivator RIP140 regulates inflammatory responses and contributes to endotoxin tolerance. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(4):379–86. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.2238 PubMed
96 Lin YW, Liu PS, Adhikari N, Hall JL, Wei LN. RIP140 contributes to foam cell formation and atherosclerosis by regulating cholesterol homeostasis in macrophages. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;79:287–94. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.12.009 PubMed
97 He Y, Zhang L, Li Z, Gao H, Yue Z, Liu Z, et al. RIP140 triggers foam-cell formation by repressing ABCA1/G1 expression and cholesterol efflux via liver X receptor. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(4):455–60. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2015.01.001 PubMed
98 Takeuchi Y, Yahagi N, Aita Y, Murayama Y, Sawada Y, Piao X, et al. KLF15 Enables Rapid Switching between Lipogenesis and Gluconeogenesis during Fasting. Cell Rep. 2016;16(9):2373–86. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.069 PubMed
99 Herzog B, Hallberg M, Seth A, Woods A, White R, Parker MG. The nuclear receptor cofactor, receptor-interacting protein 140, is required for the regulation of hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism by liver X receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21(11):2687–97. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/me.2007-0213 PubMed
100 Lu Y, Zhang L, Liao X, Sangwung P, Prosdocimo DA, Zhou G, et al. Kruppel-like factor 15 is critical for vascular inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(10):4232–41. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI68552 PubMed
101 Landmesser U, Poller W, Tsimikas S, Most P, Paneni F, Lüscher TF. From traditional pharmacological towards nucleic acid-based therapies for cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(40):3884–99. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa229 PubMed
102 Hopkins PN. Molecular biology of atherosclerosis. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(3):1317–542. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00004.2012 PubMed
103 Fitzgerald K, White S, Borodovsky A, Bettencourt BR, Strahs A, Clausen V, et al. A Highly Durable RNAi Therapeutic Inhibitor of PCSK9. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(1):41–51. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1609243 PubMed
Published under the copyright license
“Attribution – Non-Commercial – NoDerivatives 4.0”.
No commercial reuse without permission.