Review article

Epigenetic mechanisms of vascular dysfunction in obesity and type 2 diabetes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/cvm.2019.02064
Publication Date: 28.10.2019
Cardiovasc Med. 2019;22:w02064

Costantino Sarah

Centre for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland

Summary

Over the last decade, several studies have shown that epigenetic modifications – defined as changes to the genome that do not alter the DNA sequence – may affect the expression of genes involved in inflammation, oxidative stress and angiogenesis. These alterations were recently shown to promote cardiovascular disease in the setting of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Most importantly, epigenetic modifications acquired during life may be transmitted to the next generations and may contribute to pathological cardiovascular traits already present during childhood. In the context of diabetes and obesity, high blood glucose levels and insulin resistance lead to modifications of the epigenome (DNA methylation, histone marks, noncoding RNAs), which may account for a persistent impairment of vascular and cardiac function, even after correction of underlying risk factors (intensive glycaemic control, weight loss). Hence, a careful assessment of the “epigenetic landscape” in cardiometabolic patients may contribute to the estimation of global cardiovascular risk, thus providing the tools for a personalised therapeutic approach. The present review describes the emerging role of epigenetics in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular complications in obesity and type 2 diabetes.

Keywords: : epigenetics, diabetes, obesity, miRNA

Obesity and diabetes worldwide

Data from the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) indicate that 316 million people are currently affected by impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and this number is expected to reach 470 million by the year 2035 [1]. A disproportionate increase in the prevalence of obesity implies a dramatic increase of people affected by type 2 diabetes (T2D). Indeed, IDF forecasts anticipate that, in 20 years, 640 million people will be affected by diabetes worldwide (fig. 1). This equates to approximately three new cases every 10 seconds, or almost 10 million per year [1]. Most importantly, almost 50% of affected people are unaware of their condition and do not receive treatment. The progression from obesity to T2D may take several years to occur and involves various cellular mechanisms including alterations of insulin sensitivity, glucose transport and pancreatic beta cell dysfunction, as well as alteration of genes regulating oxidative stress and inflammation [2]. During this transition, a progressive deterioration of cardiovascular function is also observed. As yet, the fine molecular alterations responsible for the impairment of vascular function across the spectrum of obesity and T2D remain to be elucidated.

fullscreen
Figure 1
Worldwide prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes in 2015 and 2040. Adapted from International Diabetes Federation Atlas, 7th edition.

Epigenetic mechanisms

Over the last decade, a growing number of studies have contributed to the unveiling of the contribution of epigenetics in the pathophysiology of diabetes-related cardiovascular disease [3]. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression mainly affects DNA activity without altering its sequence. In genetically identical cells, epigenetic modifications may differentially orchestrate transcriptional programmes, thus leading to different phenotypic traits [4]. Epigenetic diversity among individuals also contributes to the explanation of monozygotic twin discordance rates for common diseases, such as asthma [4, 5]. Epigenetic mechanisms are mainly induced by environmental stimuli and can be divided into three main categories: (i) DNA methylation, (ii) histone modifications, and (iii) noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) (fig. 2) [7]. Methylation of DNA and posttranslational modifications of histones take place at the level of chromatin, whereas ncRNAs mainly act at the posttranslational and posttranscriptional levels. DNA and histones are packaged into nucleosomes. The latter are composed of a 147bp DNA strand wrapped in a superhelical way around a core of histone octamer (two H2A-H2B dimers and a H32-H42 tetramer). Chromatin may acquire two different functional states in cells: it can be packed in a structure that is inaccessible for transcription (heterochromatin) or it may assume a looser, uncondensed structure, which enables gene transcription (euchromatin).

fullscreen
Figure 2
Environmental factors and epigenetic modifications. Several environmental stimuli are able to alter DNA methylation at gene promoters, posttranslational histone modifications and expression of noncoding RNAs. Adapted from Costantino et al. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(47):4150–8 [6].

DNA methylation

DNA methylation is a covalent modification predominantly occurring at cytosine residues that are followed by guanine (CpG dinucleotides) to form 5-methylcytosine [8]. Methylation of CpG regions mainly takes place at the level of gene promoters, where it plays a pivotal role in regulating gene activity and transcription. Promoter methylation hampers gene expression mainly via two mechanisms: (i) by preventing the recruitment of transcription factors, or (ii) by fostering transcriptional silencing [9, 10]. X-chromosome inactivation represents an example of how epigenetic silencing by DNA methylation may control gene transcription [8, 11]. Different families of enzymes, known as methyltransferases (DNMTs), are involved in the regulation of DNA methylation: DNMT1 is responsible for the maintenance of methylation, whereas DNMT3a and DNMT3b are implicated into de novo methylation of DNA [9]. Methylation of DNA is a dynamic and reversible process governed by methyl-writing and -erasing enzymes. Reduced DNMT1 activity or increased expression of ten-eleven translocation enzymes (TETs), a family of methyl-erasing enzymes, are fine regulators of promoter methylation and gene expression [9, 12].

Histone modifications

Several posttranslational modifications at the level of histones (acetylation, methylation, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, sumoylation, citrullination, and ADP-ribosylation) contribute to the regulation of chromatin architecture [7]. These plastic changes repress or activate gene transcription by modifying the chromatin state (euchromatin or heterochromatin). In other words, modifications of histone tails modify the interaction between histones and DNA thus affecting chromatin accessibility in specific regions (depending on the type of modification and on the position of the modified residue). For example, acetylation of lysine residues modifies the binding strength of DNA to the histone by neutralising the negative charge of the ε-amino group of lysine. Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) are families of enzymes regulating histone acetylation [13]. Whereas acetylation is generally associated with chromatin accessibility and enhanced gene expression, the same does not apply to histone methylation, which can either enhance or repress gene transcription depending on which amino residue is modified [7]. A fine balance between histone methyltransferase (HMT) and histone demethylase (HDM) activity makes histone methylation a highly dynamic and complex process [14, 15]. Moreover, DNA methylation and histone modifications have been shown to influence each other. A well-described crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone H3K9 methylation, mediated by the heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), represents a valid example of how histone modifications may facilitate the recruitment of enzymes (DNTM3a/b) involved in DNA methylation [16]. Another example is methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2), which recruits the histone methyltransferase SUV39H1 only after binding methylated DNA [17, 18].

Noncoding RNAs

NcRNAs are not transcribed into proteins but regulate gene expression by interacting with mRNA and proteins. Several studies in recent years have clearly shown the ability of ncRNAs to regulate gene expression in health and disease. Surprisingly, only a small portion (approximately 2%) of our genome is transcribed into proteins. Based on their length, ncRNAs can be subdivided into two groups: (i) small ncRNAs (sncRNAs, <200 nucleotides long) including microRNAs (miRNAs), and (ii) long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), which have a length of between 0.2 and 2 kb [19].

Epigenetic regulation of vascular function in obesity

A main feature of the obese vasculature is represented by the progressive loss of insulin sensitivity in the vascular endothelium [20]. Vascular insulin resistance is emerging as a powerful determinant of systemic insulin resistance and cardiometabolic disturbances. Endothelium-specific insulin resistance in ApoE−/− mice leads to impaired NO signalling and aggravates atherosclerosis [21]. Of interest, endothelium-specific genetic disruption of the pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells) protects mice against insulin resistance in other insulin-sensitive organs, namely adipose tissue and skeletal muscle [22].

The key role of insulin resistance in the endothelium holds true in humans. Indeed, insulin response and subsequent endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activation are blunted in freshly isolated endothelial cells from diabetic patients, whereas pharmacological blockade of protein kinase beta (PKCβ) by LY379196 improved insulin signalling and restored eNOS activity [23]. Hence, endothelial insulin resistance may initiate metabolic alterations eventually leading to systemic impairment of insulin sensitivity [24]. Data from our lab have contributed to the finding that epigenetic signals underline alterations of insulin signalling as well as vascular inflammation and oxidative stress. Specifically, a pro-oxidant protein – known as the mitochondrial adaptor p66Shc – critically participates in obesity-related changes of the vascular phenotype. In visceral fat arteries isolated from obese patients, p66Shc was upregulated and its expression correlated with oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance, as assessed with the homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA-IR) [25]. Unbiased epigenetic analyses showed that a complex network of chromatin enzymes, specifically the methyltransferase SUV39H1, the demethylase JMJD2C and the acetyltransferase steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1), were involved in the regulation of p66Shc gene expression by inducing an open chromatin via H3K9 demethylation and acetylation (fig. 3). Interestingly enough, in vivo and in vitro targeting of SUV39H1, JMJD2C and SRC-1 rescued obesity-induced endothelial dysfunction in mice by restoring NO bioavailability [25]. It has also been found that in vivo gene silencing of p66Shc restored endothelial insulin response by affecting the IRS- 1/Akt/eNOS and NF-kB pathways [26]. This set of experiments supports the notion that epigenetic editing of p66Shc promoter contributes to the development of endothelial insulin resistance and cardiometabolic traits in patients with obesity.

fullscreen
Figure 3
Role of chromatin modifying enzymes in obesity-induced vascular disease. A complex epigenetic machinery composed of SUV39H1 SRC-1 and JMJD2C is causally implicated in the transcriptional regulation of the pro-oxidant gene p66Shc. Epigenetic-induced upregulation of p66Shc precipitates oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. H3K9me2 = histone 3 lysine 9 dimethylation; H3K9me3 = histone 3 lysine 9 trimethylation; H3K9ac = histone-3 acetylation. Adapted from Costantino et al. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(47):4150–8 [6]..

Epigenetic modifications and cardiovascular damage in type 2 diabetes

There is a clear link between high glucose levels and modifications of the epigenome. Hyperglycaemia is able to induce long-lasting epigenetic signals ultimately leading to persistent vascular damage [15]. Epigenetics may contribute to the explanation for the lack of benefit of intensive glycaemic control on cardiovascular complications in patients with T2D [2729]. The perpetuation of vascular damage despite intensive glycaemic control is termed “metabolic” or “hyperglycaemic memory” [30]. Epigenetic modifications induced by hyperglycaemia are relatively stable over time and account for persistent alterations of transcriptional programmes implicated in vascular homeostasis. Fibroblasts isolated from T2D patients with foot ulcers display reduced methylation at the promoter of genes regulating blood vessel growth, wound repair and extracellular matrix remodelling [31]. Of interest, promoter demethylation in fibroblasts remained unchanged despite restoration of normoglycaemia. Hyperglycaemia was found to reduce DNA methylation at the promoter of the adaptor p66Shc, thus leading to gene upregulation, cytochrome c oxidation and accumulation of free radicals [32]. Promoter demethylation was associated with acetylation of H3 on p66Shc promoter [32]. Persistent epigenetic changes of p66Shc were also reported in patients with diabetes. In this study, intensive glycaemic control for 6 months did not change DNA methylation and H3 acetylation of p66Shc promoter, thus leading to persistent endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress, as assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation and urinary levels of 8-isoprostane (8-isoPGF2α). Moreover, it has been found that glucose excursions in diabetic patients were responsible for the persistent activation of DNA (cytosine-5-)-methyltransferase-3β (DNMT3b) and sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), thus fostering an open chromatin and transcription of the pro-oxidant enzyme p66Shc (fig. 4) [33]. A further study showed that overexpression of SIRT1 was able to erase the hyperglycaemic memory by suppressing generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). These effects were mediated by inhibition of NF-κB/PARP and LKB1/AMPK pathways [34] (PARP = poly(ADP-ribose)-polymerase 1; LKB1 = liver kinase B1; AMPK = AMP-activated protein kinase).

fullscreen
Figure 4
Role of glycaemic variability in persistent vascular dysfunction. In patients with T2D with target HbA1c values, continuous glucose fluctuations cause downregulation of chromatin-modifying enzymes DNMT3b and SIRT1 and subsequent epigenetic changes, namely reduced DNA methylation and increased H3 acetylation. Such epigenetic marks favour an open chromatin, leading to enhanced p66Shc transcription, oxidative burst, and persistent vascular dysfunction despite IGC. Therefore, glycaemic variability maintains an epigenetic-driven transcriptional memory that may contribute to the progression of diabetic vascular complications in this setting. Adapted from Costantino et al. Diabetes. 2017;66:2472–82 [33].

Reduced trimethylation of H3K9 was reported to foster the expression of pro-inflammatory genes in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) isolated from a mouse model of T2D [35]. Mono-methylation at lysine 4 of histone 3 (H3K4m) – a specific chromatin signature induced by the methyltransferase SETD7 – was found to promote inflammatory and pro-oxidant transcriptional programmes in the diabetic endothelium [36, 37]. The detrimental action of SETD7 was mainly explained by its ability to regulate the transcription of the NF-kB subunit p65, which in turn leads to upregulation of pro-atherosclerotic genes VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 [36]. A recent study from our group has shown that SETD7 expression is increased in peripheral blood monocytes from T2D patients, and significantly correlates with endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and oxidative stress levels [37]. Importantly, several compounds have already shown the ability to inhibit SETD7 and may represent a potential therapeutic strategy to attenuate or prevent vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis [9].

Emerging evidence also support the involvement of ncRNAs in vascular and cardiac hyperglycaemic memory. Profiling of ncRNAs in the diabetic mouse heart showed that 316 miRNAs were differentially expressed as compared with non-diabetic hearts [38]. Of note, the expression of 268 miRNAs remained persistently altered despite 3 weeks of intensive glycaemic control with insulin implants. The majority of dysregulated miRNAs were found to be involved in the regulation of myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis, redox signalling and autophagy [38]. Moreover, it has been recently shown that miR-34 and miR-218, targeting SIRT1 and DNMT3b, respectively, are actively involved in chromatin remodelling, thus leading to persistent transcription of pro-oxidant genes in the heart of diabetic mice despite intensive glycaemic control [39]. These findings support the notion that ncRNAs may indirectly regulate chromatin activity, thus leading to enhanced gene expression. Altered expression of miR-125b, miR-146a-5p and miR-29a-3p in the vascular endothelium leads to persistent inflammatory signatures mainly via epigenetic modulation of NF-kB, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α-induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3), TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) [40]. Persistent upregulation of miR-23b-3p in retinal endothelial cells was found to play a detrimental role in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy by regulating SIRT1/NF-kB pathway [41]. MiR-326 – a direct regulator of adiponectin and adiponectin receptors (ADIPOR-1, ADIPOR-2) – was persistently elevated in patients with T2D, despite 12 months of intensive glycaemic control. Suppression of adiponectin signalling by miR-326 may represent an important mechanism implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiometabolic disturbances, even in patients with optimal glycaemic control [42].

Toward epigenetic-based therapies

Taken together, the evidence discussed in this review indicates that plastic modifications of chromatin are causally implicated in the regulation of genes involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular complications in the setting of obesity and T2D. Although previous work has contributed to the deciphering of detrimental epigenetic networks in the heart and the vasculature, we are still far from a thorough comprehension of epigenetic modifications and their link with tissue-specific transcriptional programmes. The latter aspect is particularly important for the design of therapies aimed at erasing epigenetic signals only in specific cell types, namely endothelial cells, VSMCs and cardiomyocytes. Targeted epigenetic therapies would also avoid undesirable effects related to modulation of gene expression in other tissues. We currently have at our disposal several compounds able to modulate epigenetic modifications [9]. Of note, several chromatin modifying drugs, such as vorinostat and valproic acid, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of several conditions including cancer, neurological and CVD. Vorinostat and thrichostatin A are histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACs) with proven efficacy in preventing endothelial dysfunction, diabetic nephropathy and ischaemia/reperfusion myocardial injury in experimental models [43, 44]. Activation of SIRT1 by resveratrol also exert beneficial effects by rescuing obesity- and T2D-related endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance [45, 46]. Future studies are warranted to investigate whether targeting epigenetic networks may represent a potential strategy to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in the cardiometabolic patient.

Disclosure statement

No financial support and no other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Correspondence

Sarah Costantino, PhD, Centre for Molecular Cardiology University of Zürich, Wagistrasse 12, Schlieren, CH-8952 Zurich, sarah.costantino[at]uzh.ch

References

1 Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, et al.IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40–50. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024 PubMed

2 Paneni F, Beckman JA, Creager MA, Cosentino F. Diabetes and vascular disease: pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and medical therapy: part I. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(31):2436–43. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht149 PubMed

3 Baccarelli A, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ. Cardiovascular epigenetics: basic concepts and results from animal and human studies. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010;3(6):567–73. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.958744 PubMed

4 Benayoun BA, Pollina EA, Brunet A. Epigenetic regulation of ageing: linking environmental inputs to genomic stability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16(10):593–610. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm4048 PubMed

5 Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, Ropero S, Setien F, Ballestar ML, et al.Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(30):10604–9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500398102 PubMed

6 Costantino S, Libby P, Kishore R, Tardif JC, El-Osta A, Paneni F. Epigenetics and precision medicine in cardiovascular patients: from basic concepts to the clinical arena. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(47):4150–8. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx568 PubMed

7 Handy DE, Castro R, Loscalzo J. Epigenetic modifications: basic mechanisms and role in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2011;123(19):2145–56. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.956839 PubMed

8 Miranda TB, Jones PA. DNA methylation: the nuts and bolts of repression. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213(2):384–90. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21224 PubMed

9 Costantino S, Paneni F, Cosentino F. Targeting chromatin remodeling to prevent cardiovascular disease in diabetes. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2015;16(6):531–43. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138920101606150407113644 PubMed

10 Costantino S, Ambrosini S, Paneni F. The epigenetic landscape in the cardiovascular complications of diabetes. J Endocrinol Invest. 2019;42(5):505–11. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0956-3 PubMed

11 Reik W. Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature. 2007;447(7143):425–32. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05918 PubMed

12 Kohli RM, Zhang Y. TET enzymes, TDG and the dynamics of DNA demethylation. Nature. 2013;502(7472):472–9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12750 PubMed

13 Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001;293(5532):1074–80. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1063127 PubMed

14 Rafehi H, Khan AW, El-Osta A. Improving understanding of chromatin regulatory proteins and potential implications for drug discovery. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2016;13(4):435–45. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14789450.2016.1159960 PubMed

15 Cooper ME, El-Osta A. Epigenetics: mechanisms and implications for diabetic complications. Circ Res. 2010;107(12):1403–13. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.223552 PubMed

16 Eskeland R, Eberharter A, Imhof A. HP1 binding to chromatin methylated at H3K9 is enhanced by auxiliary factors. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(2):453–65. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01576-06 PubMed

17 Thambirajah AA, Ng MK, Frehlick LJ, Li A, Serpa JJ, Petrotchenko EV, et al.MeCP2 binds to nucleosome free (linker DNA) regions and to H3K9/H3K27 methylated nucleosomes in the brain. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(7):2884–97. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1066 PubMed

18 Fuks F, Hurd PJ, Deplus R, Kouzarides T. The DNA methyltransferases associate with HP1 and the SUV39H1 histone methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(9):2305–12. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg332 PubMed

19 Bauersachs J, Thum T. Biogenesis and regulation of cardiovascular microRNAs. Circ Res. 2011;109(3):334–47. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.228676 PubMed

20 Avogaro A, de Kreutzenberg SV, Federici M, Fadini GP. The endothelium abridges insulin resistance to premature aging. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(3):e000262. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000262 PubMed

21 Rask-Madsen C, Li Q, Freund B, Feather D, Abramov R, Wu IH, et al.Loss of insulin signaling in vascular endothelial cells accelerates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E null mice. Cell Metab. 2010;11(5):379–89. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.013 PubMed

22 Hasegawa Y, Saito T, Ogihara T, Ishigaki Y, Yamada T, Imai J, et al.Blockade of the nuclear factor-κB pathway in the endothelium prevents insulin resistance and prolongs life spans. Circulation. 2012;125(9):1122–33. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.054346 PubMed

23 Tabit CE, Shenouda SM, Holbrook M, Fetterman JL, Kiani S, Frame AA, et al.Protein kinase C-β contributes to impaired endothelial insulin signaling in humans with diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2013;127(1):86–95. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.127514 PubMed

24 Paneni F, Costantino S, Cosentino F. Role of oxidative stress in endothelial insulin resistance. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(2):326–32. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i2.326 PubMed

25 Costantino S, Paneni F, Virdis A, Hussain S, Mohammed SA, Capretti G, et al.Interplay among H3K9-editing enzymes SUV39H1, JMJD2C and SRC-1 drives p66Shc transcription and vascular oxidative stress in obesity. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(4):383–91. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx615 PubMed

26 Paneni F, Costantino S, Cosentino F. p66(Shc)-induced redox changes drive endothelial insulin resistance. Atherosclerosis. 2014;236(2):426–9. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.07.027 PubMed

27 Paneni F, Lüscher TF. Cardiovascular Protection in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of Clinical Trial Results Across Drug Classes. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(1S):S17–27. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.015 PubMed

28 Castagno D, Baird-Gunning J, Jhund PS, Biondi-Zoccai G, MacDonald MR, Petrie MC, et al.Intensive glycemic control has no impact on the risk of heart failure in type 2 diabetic patients: evidence from a 37,229 patient meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2011;162(5):938–948.e2. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.030 PubMed

29 Boussageon R, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Saadatian-Elahi M, Lafont S, Bergeonneau C, Kassaï B, et al.Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343(jul26 1):d4169. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4169 PubMed

30 Ceriello A. The emerging challenge in diabetes: the “metabolic memory”. Vascul Pharmacol. 2012;57(5-6):133–8. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2012.05.005 PubMed

31 Park LK, Maione AG, Smith A, Gerami-Naini B, Iyer LK, Mooney DJ, et al.Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis identifies a metabolic memory profile in patient-derived diabetic foot ulcer fibroblasts. Epigenetics. 2014;9(10):1339–49. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/15592294.2014.967584 PubMed

32 Paneni F, Mocharla P, Akhmedov A, Costantino S, Osto E, Volpe M, et al.Gene silencing of the mitochondrial adaptor p66(Shc) suppresses vascular hyperglycemic memory in diabetes. Circ Res. 2012;111(3):278–89. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.266593 PubMed

33 Costantino S, Paneni F, Battista R, Castello L, Capretti G, Chiandotto S, et al.Impact of Glycemic Variability on Chromatin Remodeling, Oxidative Stress, and Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and With Target HbA1c Levels. Diabetes. 2017;66(9):2472–82. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db17-0294 PubMed

34 Zheng Z, Chen H, Li J, Li T, Zheng B, Zheng Y, et al.Sirtuin 1-mediated cellular metabolic memory of high glucose via the LKB1/AMPK/ROS pathway and therapeutic effects of metformin. Diabetes. 2012;61(1):217–28. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/db11-0416 PubMed

35 Villeneuve LM, Reddy MA, Lanting LL, Wang M, Meng L, Natarajan R. Epigenetic histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in metabolic memory and inflammatory phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells in diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(26):9047–52. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803623105 PubMed

36 El-Osta A, Brasacchio D, Yao D, Pocai A, Jones PL, Roeder RG, et al.Transient high glucose causes persistent epigenetic changes and altered gene expression during subsequent normoglycemia. J Exp Med. 2008;205(10):2409–17. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20081188 PubMed

37 Paneni F, Costantino S, Battista R, Castello L, Capretti G, Chiandotto S, et al.Adverse epigenetic signatures by histone methyltransferase Set7 contribute to vascular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015;8(1):150–8. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.114.000671 PubMed

38 Costantino S, Paneni F, Lüscher TF, Cosentino F. MicroRNA profiling unveils hyperglycaemic memory in the diabetic heart. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(6):572–6. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv599 PubMed

39 Costantino S, Paneni F, Mitchell K, Mohammed SA, Hussain S, Gkolfos C, et al.Hyperglycaemia-induced epigenetic changes drive persistent cardiac dysfunction via the adaptor p66Shc. Int J Cardiol. 2018;268:179–86. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.082 PubMed

40 Zhong X, Liao Y, Chen L, Liu G, Feng Y, Zeng T, et al.The MicroRNAs in the Pathogenesis of Metabolic Memory. Endocrinology. 2015;156(9):3157–68. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1063 PubMed

41 Zhao S, Li T, Li J, Lu Q, Han C, Wang N, et al.miR-23b-3p induces the cellular metabolic memory of high glucose in diabetic retinopathy through a SIRT1-dependent signalling pathway. Diabetologia. 2016;59(3):644–54. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3832-0 PubMed

42 Santovito D, De Nardis V, Marcantonio P, Mandolini C, Paganelli C, Vitale E, et al.Plasma exosome microRNA profiling unravels a new potential modulator of adiponectin pathway in diabetes: effect of glycemic control. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(9):E1681–5. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3843 PubMed

43 Advani A, Huang Q, Thai K, Advani SL, White KE, Kelly DJ, et al.Long-term administration of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat attenuates renal injury in experimental diabetes through an endothelial nitric oxide synthase-dependent mechanism. Am J Pathol. 2011;178(5):2205–14. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.01.044 PubMed

44 Zhang L, Qin X, Zhao Y, Fast L, Zhuang S, Liu P, et al.Inhibition of histone deacetylases preserves myocardial performance and prevents cardiac remodeling through stimulation of endogenous angiomyogenesis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012;341(1):285–93. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/jpet.111.189910 PubMed

45 Winnik S, Auwerx J, Sinclair DA, Matter CM. Protective effects of sirtuins in cardiovascular diseases: from bench to bedside. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(48):3404–12. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv290 PubMed

46 Beaudeux JL, Nivet-Antoine V, Giral P. Resveratrol: a relevant pharmacological approach for the treatment of metabolic syndrome?Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010;13(6):729–36. doi:. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e32833ef291 PubMed

Verpassen Sie keinen Artikel!

close